Even as some national conservatives come to his defense, lawmakers and his own constituents are having a hard time accepting that a hands-on manager like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie didn't know that his staff was ordering a partial shutdown of a major thoroughfare for political payback.
Urgent: Do You Like Chris Christie? Vote Now
On Sunday, several leading state lawmakers expressed skepticism that Christie didn't have at least partial knowledge of what was going on.
One high-ranking Democrat is already raising the specter of impeachment.
Assemblyman John Wisniewski, who's heading the panel probing the lane closures that snarled traffic on the George Washington Bridge last September, said the scandal "clearly becomes an impeachable offense" if Christie ordered the shutdown.
And one of the few polls conducted after the governor's two-hour press conference last week showed a majority of voters in New Jersey don't believe Christie.
New Jersey lawmakers are vowing to continue investigating the Bridge-gate scandal engulfing Christie, with the incoming speaker of the state Assembly saying he would call the body into special session.
"The documents released this week related to the George Washington Bridge situation clearly show the need for a continued thorough investigation by the New Jersey General Assembly," Democratic Speaker-elect Vincent Prieto said Saturday.
"Many questions remain unanswered about this threat to public safety and abuse of power," he said in a statement. "I expect to call the Assembly into special session on Thursday to consider legislation that would reauthorize subpoena power so this investigation can continue."
Prieto is to take the oath as speaker Tuesday.
"Using the George Washington Bridge, a public resource, to exact a political vendetta, is a crime," Wisniewski, told
NBC News on Saturday.
"Having people use their official position to have a political game is a crime. So if those tie back to the governor in any way, it clearly becomes an impeachable offense," he added
On Sunday, he said it was "unbelievable" that nobody on Christie's staff told him what was going on.
Wisniewski told "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer that not only deputy chief of staff Bridget Anne Kelly, who was fired after sending an email ordering the lane closures knew about the issues, but several of Christie's other key staffers knew as well.
"I don't think it's possible for all those people to be involved and know and the governor not know," Wisniewski said on the CBS news show Sunday.
Wisniewski said is is too far too early to discuss impeachment proceedings against the governor. But if it is proven that Christie ordered the lane closures for retribution, though, "that amounts to using public property for political purposes, which is not legal," said the senator.
As the investigation continues, and if it's proven Christie was behind ordering the bridge lanes closed,, the state's assembly has the right to write articles of impeachment against the governor, Wisniewski said.
Voters seem just as skeptical. A telephone survey of 800 likely New Jersey voters,
conducted by Rasmussen Reports, shows that 54 percent believe "it's at least somewhat likely" that Christie was aware that the lanes were closed over retaliation over the city's mayor refusing to support his reelection.
The poll showed mixed opinions among the state's normally loyal Christie supporters. Just over one-third, or 36 percent, still believe it's unlikely Christie knew anything about the plan to close the lanes before it happened, and another 30 percent think it was very likely he was aware. Just 17 percent of the voters said it was not at all likely Christie knew beforehand.
If it turns out that Christie knew beforehand, 56 percent of the states residents think he should step down, but 29 percent disagree.
Story continues below video.
© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.