Skip to main content
Tags: supreme court | ruling | prayer | public | schools

Supreme Court Ruling on Prayer in Public Schools: Exactly What Did They Rule?

By    |   Tuesday, 25 November 2014 04:06 PM EST

Prayer in public schools is an ongoing hot-button issue. While the individual right of a student to pray at school is legal, the influence and authority of school leaders and school environments makes religious expression and rules about it a complicated matter.

There are several issues to consider in the U.S. Supreme Court rulings on prayer in public schools. Here are the cases and the exact topics addressed when school prayer has been considered by the court:

ALERT: Should Prayer Be Allowed in Public Schools? Vote Now

1962, Engle v. Vitale: This case concerned a prayer required by law in New York State. Students were allowed to opt out of the so-called Regent’s Prayer, even though the prayer was non-sectarian. Even with these provisions, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on prayer in public schools said the school-sponsored prayer violated the Establishment of Religion cause in the First Amendment.

1963, School District of Abington Township, PA v. Schempp: This case examined a school district policy in which students were required to start each day by reading a passage from the Bible. Students then were required to recite the Lord’s Prayer. The court ruled that Bible passages and Lord’s Prayer violated the Establishment of Religion clause in the constitution. It did not matter that students could be excused from the exercise with a note from their parents. The court ruled the recitations constituted a religious ceremony. This case was heard along with the case of Murray v. Curlett which also involved the recitation of the Lord’s Prayer.

1972, Lemon v. Kurtzman: This case considered the use of public funds going to help support educational activities at parochial schools. The case resulted in what is referred to as the “Lemon Test.” The activity must pass three criteria in order to be considered legal. It must have a secular purpose, it must not advance or inhibit religious activity, and it must not excessively “entangle” church and state.

VOTE NOW: Do You Support Prayer in Public Schools?

1985, Wallace v. Jaffree: While this case affirmed a ruling against teacher-led prayer, it also upheld an Alabama statute that allowed schools to call for a moment of silence.

1992, Lee v. Weisman: This Supreme Court ruling on prayer in public schools involved clergy being asked to deliver prayer at school graduation ceremonies. The court ruled that the school sponsored invitation to the clergy amounted to a government sponsored religious exercise and was unconstitutional.

2000, Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe: A student school chaplain elected by the student body cannot deliver a prayer over the school’s PA system before football games. The Supreme Court ruling on prayer in public schools here involved what justices considered a violation of the Establishment of Religion clause in the constitution. The court said that the speech was not truly private expression of religion because it was delivered on state-owned property at a state-sponsored event. Since the situation could be coercive, it was found unconstitutional. The case, however, did uphold the individual student’s right to freedom of expression of religion.

URGENT: Should Students Be Allowed to Pray in Public Schools? Vote Here Now!

© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
Prayer in public schools is an ongoing hot-button issue. While the individual right of a student to pray at school is legal, the influence and authority of school leaders and school environments makes religious expression and rules about it a complicated matter.
supreme court, ruling, prayer, public, schools
522
2014-06-25
Tuesday, 25 November 2014 04:06 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved