Skip to main content
Tags: obama | china | biological

Obama Ignoring Biological Weapon Threat

By    |   Thursday, 24 September 2009 09:05 AM EDT

In my previous column I described how Gen. Chi Haotian of China predicted, in his address to the top Chinese generals and officers, China’s annihilation of one-third or two-thirds of Americans by biological weapons and the transfer of their homes and property to the new (Chinese) inhabitants of America.

Evidently, President Barack Obama has never read Chi’s speeches. Therefore he has come out with the old idea: What if the countries having nuclear weapons agree to disarm? This has never happened. But now that Obama has been elected president by voters who had never heard of Chi Haotian. . . . those voters and he must believe that it is possible to do today what was not done 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 years ago.

But why is Obama fixated on nuclear weapons? Chi wants to kill Americans with biological weapons, which is cheaper than to destroy buildings with nuclear bombs. Besides, the homes and other property of the killed Americans are to be passed over to the new settlers in America — the superior race: the Chinese.

Also, today everyone (except Obama?) knows that nano weapons surpass in many ways nuclear weapons.

Obama’s first report on his nuclear-free world was April 6. In the more than five months since the project has not budged. The first response — on Facebook — was this:

“Just more lies—12:52 a.m., April 6, 2009. There’s no way this clown is getting rid of nuclear weapons. Are you kidding? N-Korea just tossed off a small long-range missile from their island capable of reaching N-America and you are going to get rid of N-weapons. Not to mention some rogue middle-eastern states that are preparing to arm themselves. Nuclearly. Come on, Obama, just stop lying to us all!!! My sides are hurting!!!”

Russia (2,800) and the United States (2,200) have the most strategic nuclear warheads. Next come France (300), China (180), and the U.K. (160). Then there’s Israel (60), Pakistan (60), India (60), and North Korea (less than10).

Would Russia be willing to give up its nuclear weapons? Suppose Russia had them in 1940. Then the nonaggression treaty and general Russia-German friendship would not have been violated by Hitler on June 22, 1941.

Today those in power in Russia liken the China threat to Nazi Germany in the 1940s. But Russia, given its population against the 1.331 billion Chinese, can survive due to its vast superiority in nuclear weapons.

What about the United States? The same reason: The only way to survive is a nuclear counterblow against China’s biological weapons.

Incidentally, except for the beginning of World War I, no biological and other such weapons were used — for ethical reasons. Even Hitler (a notorious mass murderer) prohibited their production! Yet they can cause more human deaths per cost than can nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons will be destroyed in all nuclear countries? Albert Einstein drew Franklin D. Roosevelt’s attention to them in 1939, that is, 70 years ago. What if biological weapons outstrip nuclear weapons in the number of human deaths per cost?

Can a U.S. president cope with such problems? The American “revolutionary” war against Britain in the 18th century led to the election of a president by a majority of voters, which rules out the necessary ability of the person thus elected. Consider, the last three presidents — Obama, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton — were at the mental level of most of their voters, that is, mostly mediocrities. Dozens of millions of voters are mostly mediocrities by definition, and they elect a mediocrity.

The United States has survived against weapons of the 20th century because it has been protected by two oceans and Canada, and because the United States was the first, thanks to Einstein, to develop nuclear weapons. It is justly said that no modern war took place in the United States after England decided that it was impossible to carry supplies to their troops across the Atlantic Ocean. But today’s (Nazi) China threatens the United States with biological weapons, as Chi explains in detail in his speeches.

Well, imagine that a majority of the American population is still illiterate, and hence the president they elected could be too. He cannot read Chi in English. He won’t understand what is going on until infected, as would be millions of other Americans, by Chinese biological weapons and dying, to “clean” America for the Chinese superior race.

You can e-mail me at navlev@cloud9.net

© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


navrozov
In my previous column I described how Gen. Chi Haotian of China predicted, in his address to the top Chinese generals and officers, China’s annihilation of one-third or two-thirds of Americans by biological weapons and the transfer of their homes and property to the new...
obama,china,biological
735
2009-05-24
Thursday, 24 September 2009 09:05 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved