Protecting endangered species likely costs the economy hundreds of billions of dollars more than the federal government’s official estimates, according to a new study released Tuesday, the Washington Examiner has reported.
The libertarian think tank Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), which conducted the study, explained that the government does not factor in broader economic cost, such as lost investment opportunities for energy development.
The study stressed that "The economic impact of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is so large that states often impose regulations and management regimes as part of an effort to prevent species from being added to the endangered species list," citing as an example several western states which negotiated with the federal government to prevent an endangered listing for the chicken-sized sage grouse, which would have cost an estimated $5.6 billion in annual economic output.
The Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that the ESA was passed to prevent and reverse the decline of endangered species at "whatever the cost," which has given federal agencies broad power to block projects such as dams, logging and pipelines, according to The Daily Caller.
But the CEI report stated that "Whatever is hardly a standard that encourages fiscal responsibility, and as any bureaucrat knows, unquantified costs cannot be used as a yardstick to judge the effectiveness of a program."
The release of the report comes as the Trump administration is considering proposed regulations to reform the management of endangered species, which are expected to be more beneficial for industry, the Examiner reported.
Democrats have slammed these attempts and have warned the changes would threaten the conservation program’s successes, according to The Hill.
New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker said "I believe that we are considering a bill that in its total conception is taking us in the wrong direction" at a time when the world is in a "global extinction crisis."
© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.