New York City's pledge to stop making many marijuana arrests is playing out on the streets, where arrests and summonses for small-time pot possession have plummeted since the policy change this fall.
After a mid-November turn toward violations and summonses instead of misdemeanor arrests for carrying modest amounts of pot, such arrests plunged by 75 percent in December compared to last year, from about 1,820 to 460, according to state Division of Criminal Justice statistics obtained by The Associated Press. The November numbers fell 42 percent, from 2,200 to 1,280.
Even summonses have fallen by about 10 percent since the policy change, to 1,180, compared to the same period a year ago, New York Police Department figures show.
"Since the inception of our policy in 2014, marijuana enforcement activity is trending down in all categories" for the bottom-rung marijuana charge, Deputy Chief Kim Royster told the AP.
Critics who decried the once-spiking arrests see the decline as promising. But they say it's too early to draw lasting conclusions, especially since low-level arrests and summonses of all kinds plummeted for a few weeks after the deadly shootings of two officers Dec. 20.
"Clearly, progress is being made," but it needs to continue and deepen, said Gabriel Sayegh, the Drug Policy Alliance's New York state director.
The plunge in arrests caps dramatic shifts in recent years in how the nation's biggest city polices small amounts of pot.
Arrests for the lowest-level marijuana charge — possession of less than 25 grams, about a sandwich bag full — shot up from about 5,700 in 1995 to 50,700 in 2011, spurring criticism of police tactics and priorities. Then the arrests started declining notably amid public pressure and some police instruction and procedural changes, hitting about 29,000 in 2013.
Critics of the arrests suggest the summons strategy isn't a perfect solution. Multiple marijuana-possession convictions can spur deportation even if the charges are violations — something defendants may not grasp if they decide to plead guilty, thinking the only consequence is a fine, legal advocates say. They also have concerns about how cases will be handled in crowded summons courts.
"A more meaningful change would be to de-emphasize enforcement of non-criminal violations across the board," the New York Civil Liberties Union said in City Council hearing testimony last month.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.